News from the Naval Neck of the Woods

navy ships at pier

Sequester, sequester, sequester.  We’ve heard a lot about this automatic cut in spending, and we’ve been assured it’s not going to kick in, because the Dems and the GOP are going to agree to something better, and the Super Committee is going to swoop in and save the day, dontcha know.

Like your friend’s annoying little sister, though, it keeps popping up no matter what they do to stave it off.

So, military muckety-mucks have to prepare for their share of cuts, which is, oh . . .  about half.  Here’s the latest:  US Navy:  Sequester Means Strike Groups Could Stay Home.

I happen to have a handy-dandy little military-to-civilian translator thingy here with me right now, also known as my husband.  He’s going to help me summarize and translate from Milspeak to English.

First, you might not know what a ‘strike group’ is.  I’m not sure how much of this stuff is common knowledge.  It is a group of five or six boats:  one carrier and the ships that support it.  Each boat has its own captain, but they all take orders from the strike group’s admiral, who in turn looks to ‘fleet command’ for his orders.

The important take-aways from the article:

1) Travel will be severely limited and non-essential conferences will be cancelled.  Generally, “travel” in the military means leaving your duty station on temporary orders for training purposes.  This expense could probably be cut quite a bit.  (There’s not much a sailor likes more than a boondoggle.)  Hopefully, mission-essential training and permanent changes of duty station (PCS) won’t be hampered.

2) Information technology support is being cut.  Will the budgets for hardware and software also be cut?  If yes, maybe it’ll work out.  Otherwise, yikes.  (In my experience the computer system is always a mess because they are always “upgrading” because if the command doesn’t spend it this year they won’t get it next year.)

3) Bases must plan to cancel repair and modernization of nearly all piers, runways and buildings through September.  One can only guess about the current condition of most piers, runways, and buildings.  They likely run the gamut.

4) Depot-level maintenance on about 250 aircraft scheduled between April and September could be cancelled.  Even my handy translator had to look this one up.  The gist:  if a squadron can’t do the repair itself, then it must be done by a military or commercial “depot,” but not so much if sequestration.  Maybe we’ll just get along okay with fewer planes, especially since #5:

5) Overhauls to about 30 of the fleet’s 187 surface ships will be cancelled.  Use of the phrase “surface ships” is interesting.  The Navy currently has a total of 288 deployable ships, so . . . the other 101 must be subs and tankers and stuff?  Thirty is a pretty big chunk of 187.

6) Nearly 10 percent of the government shipyard workforce — more than 3,000 employees — will be reduced.  Makes sense.  If you haven’t got money to repair your stuff anymore, there’s no point in keeping all those repairmen around.

I can’t help but wonder if there aren’t other, less essential areas ripe for streamlining though . . . like the Pentagon.  It has approximately 23,000 employees.  A 10% cut there would account for the bulk of layoffs needed.

Reckon it pays off when one’s job is to plan for the expenditure of federal resources.  It’s only natural to include oneself as a crucial component.

Tagged: ,

8 thoughts on “News from the Naval Neck of the Woods

  1. Conservatives on Fire 25 January 2013 at 6:28 pm Reply

    It’s hard to know if the navy is playing it straight or playing at fear mongering. When cities need to raise taxes, they all say if the taxes aren’t approved, they will have layoff policemen, fire fighters, first responders and school teachers. They never threaten to layoff bureaucrats because that wouldn’t scare anybody. maybe the navy is using the same tactics.

    • AFVet 26 January 2013 at 7:11 pm Reply

      The Navy will be fine, and so will the Air Force and the Army and the Marines.
      Bureaucrats will never be laid off because they make the rules.
      Threaten them with budget cuts and they threaten you with no police or fire protection.
      Or a limited military.
      Threaten the schools with budget cuts and the first thing they do is cut busing.
      Never the 6 figure salaries they pull down from the taxpayers.
      The aristocrats are telling you how your money will be spent, and who gets it.

      Well, on the local level I see the same philosophy as on the national level.
      Go figure.

  2. NEO 25 January 2013 at 9:52 pm Reply

    They could be but, if so I hope they have another plan in their back pocket in case it happens, these are major cuts.

  3. Harvey Chao 26 January 2013 at 2:15 pm Reply

    “Reckon it pays off when one’s job is to plan for the expenditure of federal resources. It’s only natural to include oneself as a crucial component.”

    Oh you mean like Congress?

  4. AFVet 26 January 2013 at 6:43 pm Reply

    The shell game within the military will always continue.
    Your post brings back memories to me when I was in.
    You read this stuff and say,…WTF over !

    Here is a factoid that I ran across a day ago on

    In 1776 there were 2.5 million people living in this Country.
    In 2011, the civilian federal employees, (excluding postal workers), totaled 2.15 million.
    FUBAR !

    Fair Winds and Following Seas to you and your family.

  5. Citizen Tom 26 January 2013 at 9:47 pm Reply

    You have to wonder why the GOP agreed to the stupid agreement that allowed the military to suffer such “terrible cuts.” The answer? The cuts are not as big as they seem. We are talking about cutting from a “baselined budget” that assumes growth.

    Why is the military taking a relatively big hit? Sequestration targeted “discretionary spending.” Defense spending, the primary thing the Constitution chartered Congress to spend money on, is “discretionary spending.” Unconstitutional spending, like Social Security and Medicare — that’s “nondiscretionary.” In fact, most of the budget is so-called nondiscretionary spending.

    Defense spending does not by congressmen as many votes as health, education, and welfare spending. It just keeps some foreign power from taking over our country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: