Today I find myself mentally debating this question again, this time about Hilary Rosen’s “never worked a day in her life” schtick.
I wrestle with this mental debate a lot, and I can never truly make up my mind. Neither answer satisfies my rather unfortunate urge to understand these people because either way, the truth is unsettling.
Take Ms. Rosen’s case, for example. Either she is disdainful of women who (if they are “rich enough” to have the “luxury” of the choice) decide not to work, or she is willing to say anything with a straight face if it will benefit her political party.
Which is it? And did you notice how clever that little limitation is? The disdain is reserved only for the rich stay-at-home moms, ‘natch. Disparaging the opinions of all stay-at-home moms would be beyond the pale, even for the most leftist of the left.
Of course, this limitation only works if it’s true. First, it must be true that rich persons cannot understand the difficulties of the poor. In other words, there is no such thing as empathy in Ms. Rosen’s world.
Second, it must be true that staying home is a luxury reserved for the wealthy. And oh, looky, right on cue, the President enters stage left with his ridiculous claim that they couldn’t afford the “luxury” of Michelle staying home. (Never-you-mind about the First Lady’s opinion. That was way back in 2007 when she said that staying home makes her ill.)
Do you know what?
I’m tired of wondering whether these people are actually thick enough to believe the ridiculous things they say.
Is it purely partisan political hackery? Or do they really believe that only the rich can live comfortably on one income? If so, then the Obamas and the Rosens may as well live on the moon, they are so far out of touch. Come on over to my house, guys. Meet me and all my stay-at-home mom buddies. We exist. None of us are even the teensiest bit rich.
Oh, no. See what I’m doing? Mentally debating the “ignorance v. calculation” question. Again! I may need professional help.
It’s just . . . I’m confused. I can’t even keep up with the various lines of reasoning. Does the left believe there is a real Republican War on Women? (In which women are dying! Dying! Because evil conservatives are killing them during childbirth!)
Or not? Because we have Ms. Rosen saying the Democrats had actually never used the phrase “War on Women,” and that it was a Republican invention.
Okay. I guess I’m done. I thought I’d have something more meaningful to say about The Left and The Right and The Staying Home and The Mommy Wars, which is normally like crack to my little brain.
Yet, here I am too far into a post to just delete it, and with nothing more meaningful to add than this: it doesn’t matter what we say anymore. We’d probably be better off not responding at all.
Ann Kane at The American Thinker says it best:
“Wouldn’t it be cool if he next time the Left entices us with some manufactured crisis, we just ignore it and continue on with exposing what’s really going on?”
“Contrary to what a lot of folks on our side are saying these attacks are far more important to defend against than obsessing over Romney’s position on Afghanistan or the capital gains tax because this election is not going to be fought over issues and ideas. . . . Obama . . . doesn’t have issues and he doesn’t have accomplishments so all that is left to him is to tear down Romney.
If he can convince you that Romney is a cross between Scrooge McDuck and Moe Howard who adheres to a very strange set of religious beliefs then he wins.”
Cross-posted at Disrupt The Narrative. Hop on over there, too. You know you want to!