Washington Math

This exchange between Senator Sessions and Education Secretary Duncan is amusing.  The video itself is worth your time–if only to see the parental smirk on Session’s face, and hear the parental tone in his voice as he doggedly throws wrenches of fact into Duncan’s well-oiled machinations.

Here are the best parts, though, transcribed and annotated by yours truly for your reading pleasure.

Sessions starts off by asking Duncan if the debt is a problem.  Duncan responds:

 “I think those are absolutely valid concerns . . . . The President is committed to a trillion dollars in deficit reduction over the next decade . . . .”

Sessions:  “Well over the next decade, the deficit will double from 13 trillion to 26 trillion, and, you can say that cuts and saves a trillion, but it doesn’t seem like it to me.”

(Sessions probably meant to say that the overall debt will double, not the deficit.)

Oh, Duncan.  The debt v. deficit trick?  The budget is fiscally responsible because it reduces the yearly deficit?  (“Reducing the deficit” merely slows debt growth.  It does not pay off the debt.  The debt continues to grow.  But I bet you already knew that.)

Sessions then asks whether it’s correct to say that the President’s budget proposal doubles the 2008 level of Pell Grant aid, from 18 billion to 36 billion dollars.

Duncan responds:

“We can go thru the numbers.  We are going to save, uh, we have a way of closing the Pell shortfall, 20 billion dollars worth. [translation:  see this hat?  watch this . . . look, a bunny!  I pulled a bunny out of the hat!]  But let me be very very clear. [where did he pick up that phrase, hmm?]  What our country desperately needs is many more young people going to college and graduating. . . . Four million jobs are unfilled because we’re not producing the skilled workers that our country needs. . . .”

Our country desperately needs . . . more college graduates.  Huh.  That’s weird. 

This Is My Credulous Face

 I could have sworn that the problem is having too few jobs for workers, not the other way around.  But even if we stipulate to a shortage of workers, then we have to swallow this big whopper:  holding a college degree–of any type, presumably–is proof-positive that you are a skilled worker.

Yeah.  Listen.  I’m a girl with an almost, but not quite, entirely useless undergrad degree in economics.

This degree did not make me a skilled worker.

Furthermore, word on the ‘net is that college often fails to improve a student’s basic skills, like writing and critical thinking.

Sessions continues,

“Well I think we can all agree that funding and money does not necessarily improve education.  Your proposal . . . doubling the entire budget, and we don’t have the money. . . . We’ve now taken over the student loans; 100% is federal.  But according to our calculations, the total of these loans will go from 98 billion in 2008, to 167 billion in 2012, is that correct?”

Duncan starts to stall a bit at this point:

“I don’t know the exact numbers [veering off point until redirected by Sessions]. . . . We have many more people accessing higher education, which as a country we desperately need.  The only way we strengthen our economy long-term is to produce the innovators, the entrepreneurs, the knowledge workers–”

Because college is all about cranking out the innovators and entrepreneurs.  Mercifully, Sessions interrupts him.

Sessions:  “Well why don’t we just spend three times as much?  Won’t that just help us fix it all?”

Duncan:  “Well actually we made some very tough cuts in Pell Grants, so we asked for a 5 billion dollar increase, but we are reducing costs by 15 billion dollars.”

Sessions:  “Well this is Washington math.  You haven’t cut Pell Grants.  Pell Grants are increasing dramatically Mr. Secretary.  The numbers are plain.”

Duncan:  “That’s correct, and it would have increased even more substantially, did we not make the tough and painful decision to eliminate–”

Sessions:  “You’re proposing they increase that much.  They are not going to be increased that much because we don’t have the money.”

Ha ha ha!  Washington math, indeed.  Did you catch that?  A 5 billion dollar increase is a product of “very tough cuts.”  Cuts in spending create . . . an increase in spending.   (And who knows whether the purported cuts are even real.) 

Did Sarah Palin turn you into a newt, too, Secretary Duncan?

Oh, I’ve written enough.  Here’s the video.  Share and enjoy!

About these ads

Tagged: , , , ,

9 thoughts on “Washington Math

  1. wormme 1 March 2011 at 11:49 pm Reply

    Thank you for the link, m’lady!

    From you post, it’s good to see the number of adults in government is increasing. It might not be fast enough, but it’s something.

  2. Lynn Comp 1 March 2011 at 11:50 pm Reply

    gee, is this so more people get art degrees, degrees in female studies and history degrees? that’ll make the worker base more skilled, although if you watch any of the Wisconsin protest videos or the other union support event videos on the net, apparently education doesn’t increase ones vocabulary beyond using the f-bomb as a noun, verb, adverb and adjective. Does that make us more competitive vs. the Chinese? dunno, but it certainly convinces me of why manufacturing bases moved overseas

  3. LD Jackson 2 March 2011 at 5:59 am Reply

    Secretary Duncan looked like a fish out of water for a minute or two, until he started talking about spending more money. He was right at home then. Does he really expect anyone to buy the line that spending more money on Pell Grants is actually cutting spending?

  4. AFVET 2 March 2011 at 1:45 pm Reply

    Duncan wouldn’t have lasted a week in the private sector with answers like that.

  5. KingShamus 2 March 2011 at 5:45 pm Reply

    Arne Duncan kinda sucks, doesn’t he?

    I mean, if you’re going to be a hack, at least be able to come up with some other method of selling Obama’s bullcrap besides the crusty old ‘Increasing spending = Tough Cuts’ logic that nobody except the smart-tard Wisconsin teachers believes anymore.

  6. [...] Washington Math [...]

  7. Bob Mack 4 March 2011 at 1:14 am Reply

    Duncan is a member of BHO’s Windy City Cosa Nostra, with an eye to indoctrinating students in ‘green’ theology (http://crockettlives.wordpress.com/2010/09/24/arnes-army/). The best thing that can reasonably be said about him is that he’s not quite an out-and-out Marxist like most of the rest of Obama’s misbegotten cabal.

  8. [...] case you missed Arne Duncan’s nutty testimony last week, No One of Any Import has the [...]

  9. nooneofanyimport 5 March 2011 at 12:13 am Reply

    Yer welcome as usual, Wormy my friend

    Amen to Lynn, and LD, he only hopes to convince the gullible

    Ron, folks like Duncan are the reason the private sector is so endangered, huh?

    You royal Shamus, there is no other method of selling the bullcrap, is there?

    Bob, that is cold comfort my friend, lol

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 657 other followers

%d bloggers like this: